Introduction: To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE(S) OF THE WEEK |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TIRTHADEVA SIVAN PREMKUMAR v. PREVENTIVE DETENTION: Detention order - Validity of - Habeas corpus - Application for - Findings of inquiry officer - Whether a positive finding made pursuant to s. 10(2) of the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 ('the Act') - Prevention of Crime Board ('Board') confirmed inquiry officer's positive finding under s. 11(2)(a) - Whether mandatory requirement to serve copy of Board's decision to applicant under s. 10(4) relevant - Whether applicant deprived of right to request Board to review decision under s. 10(3)(b) - Whether there was miscarriage of justice - Whether Prevention of Crime (Advisory Board Procedure) Regulations 2014 made within powers conferred by the Act - Whether enactment of s. 19A(4) strengthens Minister's powers to make regulations - Federal Constitution, art. 151 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LATEST CASES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal Network Series
CLJ 2016 Volume 5 (Part 6) COURT OF APPEAL Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd v. Dato' Sri Diraja Hj Adnan Hj Yaakob HIGH COURT Econpile (M) Sdn Bhd v. Irdk Ventures Sdn Bhd & Another Case Homewest Sdn Bhd v. Vision Returns Sdn Bhd Jasmine Food Corporation Sdn Bhd v. Leong Wai Choon & Anor Stealth Infra Sdn Bhd v. Sr Alias Marjoh Tirthadeva Sivan Premkumar v. Pengerusi Lembaga Pencegahan Jenayah Malaysia & Ors SUBJECT INDEX CIVIL PROCEDURE Action - Capacity to sue - Defamation action - Whether Menteri Besar had locus standi to initiate suit for defamation in official capacity - Public interest considerations - Whether public officials should be open to criticism - Whether public officials could denounce criticisms by suing their critics - Whether right of freedom of speech and expression would be stifled - Federal Constitution, art. 10(1)(a) Striking out - Action - Defamation action - Whether Menteri Besar had locus standi to initiate action for defamation in official capacity - Public interest considerations - Whether public officials should be open to criticism - Whether public officials could denounce criticisms by suing their critics - Whether right of freedom of speech and expression would be stifled - Whether suit ought to be struck out - Rules of Court 2012, O. 18 r. 19(1)(b) & (d) Summary judgment - Application for - Copyright and trade mark infringements - Whether defendants raised bona fide defence or triable issues warranting trial - Whether summary judgment ought to be allowed COMPANY LAW Winding up - Inability to pay debts - Failure to make payment despite being served with statutory demand - Whether company commercially insolvent - Whether adverse effect of winding up order relevant in deciding petition - Companies Act 1965, ss. 218(1)(a) & (e) Winding up - Stay of proceedings - Pending disposal of appeal - Whether there were exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of discretion to grant short adjournment - Whether short adjournment could be allowed with condition that demanded sum should be paid into court - Whether adjournment would cause prejudice to petitioner - Companies Act 1965, ss. 221(1), 222 & 243(1) CONSTRUCTION LAW Adjudication - Setting aside - Claim for works done - Application to set aside decision of adjudicator - Dispute in payment claims - Termination of contract - Whether respondent bound to make further payments until final account determined upon completion of works - Whether adjudicator had authority to withhold release of decision on account of non-payment of Goods and Service Tax (`GST') - Whether withholding of decision for non-payment of GST rendered adjudication decision void - Granting of interest in absence of submission by either parties - Whether amounted to breach of natural justice - Construction Industry Payment And Adjudication Act 2012, ss. 5, 6 CONTRACT Breach - Termination - Letter of award to develop land - Termination of letter of award - Claim for specific performance or damages for loss of profits in lieu of specific performance - Whether issuance of letter of award authorised - Whether letter of award in compliance with the law - Whether committee members had knowledge of letter of award - Applicability of Turquand's rule - Whether there was lack of consideration - Whether letter of award amounted to conditional/contingent award INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Copyright - Infringement of - Claim for copyright in relation to graphical work in rice product packaging - Whether plaintiff owned copyright to rice product packaging - Whether defendants infringed plaintiff's copyright - Similarity of graphical work - Whether established Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Passing off - Claim for copyright in relation to graphical work in rice product packaging - Whether plaintiff acquired goodwill and reputation of trade mark - Whether plaintiff had sufficient reputation in goods or services offered to public - Whether there was misrepresentation by defendants that led public to believe that rice products sold were plaintiff's goods - Whether plaintiff suffered damages or injury to business or goodwill due to defendant's misrepresentation PREVENTIVE DETENTION Detention order - Validity of - Habeas corpus - Application for - Findings of inquiry officer - Whether a positive finding made pursuant to s. 10(2) of the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 (`the Act') - Prevention of Crime Board (`Board') confirmed inquiry officer's positive finding under s. 11(2)(a) - Whether mandatory requirement to serve copy of Board's decision to applicant under s. 10(4) relevant - Whether applicant deprived of right to request Board to review decision under s. 10(3)(b) - Whether there was miscarriage of justice - Whether Prevention of Crime (Advisory Board Procedure) Regulations 2014 made within powers conferred by the Act - Whether enactment of s. 19A(4) strengthens Minister's powers to make regulations - Federal Constitution, art. 151 TORT Defamation - Libel - Article published in mainstream newspaper - Contents of article revolved around Menteri Besar Pahang and perceived weaknesses of his administration - Whether article concerned Menteri Besar in his personal capacity or maligned him personally - Whether Menteri Besar had locus standi to file defamation suit in official capacity - Whether public officials should be open to criticism - Whether public officials could denounce criticisms by suing their critics - Whether right of freedom of speech and expression would be stifled - Federal Constitution, art. 10(1)(a) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTICLES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LNS Article(s)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Acts
Amending Acts
PU(A)
PU(B)
Legislation Alert Updated
Revoked
|