Introduction: To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE(S) OF THE WEEK |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PP v. MUHAMMAD KASYFULLAH KASSIM [2017] 1 CLJ 63 CRIMINAL LAW: Penal Code - Section 130J(1)(b) - Giving support to commission of terrorist act involving use of firearms - Sentence - Adequacy - Sentence of five years' imprisonment - Whether too lenient - Public interest - Whether given due consideration - Whether more deterrent sentence ought to be imposed CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Sentencing - Adequacy - Giving support to commission of terrorist act involving use of fire arms - Whether a serious crime - Whether warranting severe punishment - Sentence of five years' imprisonment - Whether too lenient - Whether inadequate |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LATEST CASES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal Network Series
CLJ 2017 Volume 1 (Part 1) FEDERAL COURT Thitapha Charoenchuea lwn. PP COURT OF APPEAL Dee Bee Yoke & Anor v. Nick Abu Dasuki Hj Abu Hassan & Anor Bar Council Malaysia & Anor v. Judy Blacious AF Pereira Bellajade Sdn Bhd v. CME Group Bhd & Anor PP v. Muhammad Kasyfullah Kassim HIGH COURT Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd v. Tengku Dato' Kamal Ibni Sultan Sir Abu Bakar & Ors Malayan Banking Bhd v. Pengarah Tanah Dan Galian Negeri Selangor Martego Sdn Bhd v. Arkitek Meor & Chew Sdn Bhd & Another Case SUBJECT INDEX CIVIL PROCEDURE Appeal - Appeal against order - Committal order stemming from failure to honour orders by High Court and Court of Appeal - Whether appeal made within period specified under r. 12 of Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994 Judgments and orders - Committal order - Failure to honour orders by High Court and Court of Appeal - Whether committal proceeding proper - Whether there were merits in contention to resist order for committal - Rules of Court 2012, O. 45 r. 5(1) Jurisdiction - Concurrent jurisdiction - High Court - Petition for admission as advocate and solicitor - High Court prepared to allow petition on strict condition - Petitioner fixed petition before subsequent High Court Judge without complying with strict condition ordered by previous High Court Judge - Whether petition to be dismissed - Order of judge of concurrent jurisdiction - Whether to be respected and given effect to Jurisdiction - Inherent jurisdiction and powers of court - Application to review and order rehearing of appeal before another panel - Whether court seized with power to review decision of another panel - Whether conditions for exercise of court's review jurisdiction met - Asean Security Paper Mills Sdn Bhd v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance (Malaysia) Bhd CONSTRUCTION LAW Adjudication - Claim for professional fees - Termination of contract - Whether firm of architects may claim professional fees in adjudication for consultancy services rendered in construction contract - Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, s. 37(1) - Architects Act 1967, s. 7A - Architects Rules 1996, r. 24 Adjudication - Jurisdiction - Fees for architectural consultancy services - Whether Adjudicator acted in excess of jurisdiction in arriving at decision - Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, ss. 25(a), 37(1) Adjudication - Setting aside - Application to set aside decision of Adjudicator - Adjudicator rejected request for oral hearing - Adjudication proceeding conducted by way of submission of documents only - Whether there was need for oral hearing for dispute - Whether there was breach of natural justice - Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, s. 25(a) CONTRACT Agreement - Tenancy agreement - Breach - Tenant defaulted in payment of rental - Claim for recovery of outstanding and remaining rentals by landlord - Tenancy contravened express condition of title of land where premises were built on - Whether tenant aware of contravention of express condition of title when it entered into tenancy agreement - Whether tenancy agreement valid - Whether tenancy agreement a contract discovered to be void within meaning of s. 66 of Contracts Act 1950 - Whether tenant liable to pay outstanding rental due under tenancy agreement - Whether tenant entitled to recover payments of rental previously made CRIMINAL LAW Penal Code - Section 130J(1)(b) - Giving support to commission of terrorist act involving use of firearms - Sentence - Adequacy - Sentence of five years' imprisonment - Whether too lenient - Public interest - Whether given due consideration - Whether more deterrent sentence ought to be imposed CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Sentencing - Adequacy - Giving support to commission of terrorist act involving use of fire arms - Whether a serious crime - Whether warranting severe punishment - Sentence of five years' imprisonment - Whether too lenient - Whether inadequate LAND LAW Acquisition of land - Acquisition by State Authority - Land charged to bank as security for loan - Bank did not get security bargained for - Whether Land Administrator failed to make memorial of land acquisition - Whether land authority negligent for failing to cancel issue document of title - Whether Land Administrator negligent in executing transfer of land - Whether land authority failed to abide by procedures under ss. 25, 26 and 27 of Land Acquisition Act 1960 - Whether act of negligence and omission led bank to suffer losses LEGAL PROFESSION Admission - Petition for admission - High Court prepared to allow petition on strict condition - Petitioner fixed petition before subsequent High Court Judge without complying with strict condition ordered by previous High Court Judge - Subsequent High Court Judge found petitioner complied with strict conditional order - Whether strict condition complied with - Whether petition ought to be allowed - Whether to be dismissed - Legal Profession Act 1976, ss. 11 & 16 TORT Negligence - Breach of statutory duty - Acquisition of land by State Authority - Land charged as security for loan - Bank did not get security bargained for - Whether Land Administrator failed to make memorial of land acquisition - Whether land authority negligent for failing to cancel issue document of title - Whether Land Administrator negligent in executing transfer of land - Whether pleadings of absence of knowledge of land acquisition was misconceived and baseless - Whether act of negligence and omission led bank to suffer losses INDEKS PERKARA PROSEDUR JENAYAH Perbicaraan - Alasan penghakiman - Tanggungjawab menyediakan alasan penghakiman - Sama ada hanya perlu menyediakan satu alasan penghakiman sahaja - Penyediaan alasan penghakiman tambahan oleh hakim bicara - Sama ada dilarang oleh statut - Kesan-kesan - Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964, s. 52 - Kanun Tatacara Jenayah, s. 278 UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 ('ADB') - Seksyen 39B(1) - Mengedar 1838.4 gram kanabis - Akhir kes pendakwaan - Andaian s. 37(da) ADB - Sama ada boleh digunakan - Kegagalan membuat dapatan afirmatif sama ada andaian disangkal atau tidak atas imbangan kebarangkalian - Sama ada memudaratkan - Sama ada terpakai - Sama ada hanya kesalahan memiliki dadah berbahaya dibuktikan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTICLES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LNS Article(s)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Acts
Amending Acts
PU(A)
PU(B)
Legislation Alert Updated
Revoked
|