Introduction: To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE(S) OF THE WEEK |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JERRY WA DUSING & ANOR v. MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ORS [2017] 1 CLJ 133 CIVIL PROCEDURE: Parties - Intervention - Proceedings - Application by body corporate to intervene in judicial review proceedings - Threshold test for intervention - Whether existence of direct interest satisfied - Whether order for intervention by High Court ought to be set aside - Whether body corporate may appear as amicus curiae in judicial review proceedings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LATEST CASES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal Network Series
CLJ 2017 Volume 1 (Part 2) COURT OF APPEAL Jerry WA Dusing & Anor v. Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Ors Pernas Oue (KL) Sdn Bhd Trading As Hotel Istana v. Menteri Sumber Manusia Malaysia & Ors PP v. Bonadventure Chinedu Okoro HIGH COURT Billion Prima Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Nutech Company Ltd & Anor Chip Lam Seng Enterprise Bhd (In Liquidation) v. Euphoria Technologies Sdn Bhd & Anor Ling Towi Sing & Ors v. Dato' Ng Kong Yeam; Kay Swee Pin & Anor (Proposed Interveners) Vitol Asia Pte Ltd v. The Owners Of The Ship Or Vessel "Malik Al Ashtar" Of The Port Of Malta; ING Bank NV & Anor (Interveners) SUBJECT INDEX ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Remedies - Certiorari - Judicial review - Application to quash Minister's order for Hotel to give recognition to Union - Process of ascertaining whether workmen were members of Union - Whether membership check should be by secret ballot or membership verification exercise - Whether relevant date for determination of membership check was date of claim for recognition - Failure of High Court to grant consequential mandamus order - Whether claim for recognition concluded or void - Whether doctrine of functus officio arose
CIVIL PROCEDURE Discovery - Application for - Discovery action against third parties - Conditions to be fulfilled - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 rr. 7A & 8 - Whether affidavit specified documents sought with reasonable precision - Whether documents relevant to issues arising - Whether relevancy requirement satisfied - Whether application frivolous, vexatious or a fishing expedition - Whether documents sought were in possession, custody or power of third party - Whether disclosure of documents necessary to fairly dispose of action - Whether any privilege asserted in respect of documents - Whether court could invoke discretionary power to allow application Discovery - Inspection of documents - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 - Transfer of sale shares - Whether void for want of good faith and valuable consideration - Whether true value of sale shares dependant on financial standing of company - Whether documents sought relevant to issues in dispute - Whether a mere fishing expedition - Whether documents sought in possession, custody and power of defendants - Whether liquidator would be limited or restricted from performing statutory duty if documents only made available for directors of company - Whether discovery and inspection of documents necessary to dispose of originating summons fairly - Whether liquidator proved essential elements for order for discovery - Companies Act 1965, ss. 174, 233 & 293 - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 52 Discovery - Relevancy of documents - Application for - Conditions to be fulfilled - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 rr. 7A & 8 - Whether affidavit specified documents sought with reasonable precision - Whether documents relevant to issues arising - Whether relevancy requirement satisfied - Whether application frivolous, vexatious or a fishing expedition - Whether documents sought were in possession, custody or power of third party - Whether disclosure of documents necessary to fairly dispose of action - Whether any privilege asserted in respect of documents - Whether court could invoke discretionary power to allow application Documents - Discovery and inspection of documents - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 - Transfer of sale shares - Whether void for want of good faith and valuable consideration - Whether true value of sale shares dependant on financial standing of company - Whether documents sought relevant to issues in dispute - Whether a mere fishing expedition - Whether documents sought in possession, custody and power of defendants - Whether liquidator would be limited or restricted from performing statutory duty if documents only made available for directors of company - Whether discovery and inspection of documents necessary to dispose of originating summons fairly - Whether liquidator proved essential elements for order for discovery - Companies Act 1965, ss. 174, 233 & 293 - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 52 Judgments and orders - Application to intervene and set aside - Court declared respondent of unsound mind and appointed lawful wife and children as committee to manage respondent's affairs - Whether respondent's mistress and illegitimate child as proposed interveners could be added as party to proceedings - Whether proposed interveners had locus standi - Rules of Court 2012, O. 15 r. 6(2)(b)(i) - Whether proposed interveners entitled to be served with notice of application - Whether an inquiry should be ordered to determine respondent's mental health under s. 52 of Mental Health Act 2001 - Whether medical report submitted in court questionable - Whether new inquiry under ss. 62 & 74 of Mental Health Act 2001 should have been ordered - Whether there was inordinate delay in filing application Parties - Intervention - Proceedings - Application by body corporate to intervene in judicial review proceedings - Threshold test for intervention - Whether existence of direct interest satisfied - Whether order for intervention by High Court ought to be set aside - Whether body corporate may appear as amicus curiae in judicial review proceedings Parties - Joinder of parties - Proposed interveners - Appointment of lawful wife and children as committee to manage respondent's affairs - Whether respondent's mistress and illegitimate child as proposed interveners could be added as party to proceedings - Whether proposed interveners had locus standi - Rules of Court 2012, O. 15 r. 6(2)(b)(i) - Whether proposed interveners entitled to be served with notice of application - Whether an inquiry should be ordered to determine respondent's mental health under s. 52 of Mental Health Act 2001 - Whether medical report submitted in court questionable - Whether new inquiry under ss. 62 & 74 of Mental Health Act 2001 should have been ordered - Whether there was inordinate delay in filing application Writ - Writ in rem - Application to amend statement of claim - Whether application bona fide - Whether prejudice caused to other side could be compensated by costs - Whether amendments changed character of suit - Whether application to amend statement of claim bona fide - Whether proposed amendments meant to tailor claim to fit judgment in Canpotex Shipping Services Ltd & Ors v. Marine Petrobulk & Ors Writ - Writ in rem - Application to set aside - Claim for price of bunkers - Whether action wrongly brought against defendant - Whether defendant had contractual nexus with plaintiff for purchase and supply of bunkers - Whether a contractual lien came into existence - Whether a lien gave plaintiff a right to payment - Whether there was maritime lien in rem available to suppliers of bunkers in English or Malaysian law - Whether plaintiff's claim misconceived CRIMINAL LAW Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking in 837.9g of methamphetamine - Drugs discovered in bag carried by accused - Whether accused had knowledge of drugs inside bag - Defence of innocent carrier - Whether established CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Appeal - Appeal by prosecution - Accused charged for trafficking in 837.9g of methamphetamine - Drugs discovered in bag carried by accused - Whether accused had knowledge of drugs inside bag - Defence of innocent carrier - Whether established - Whether trial judge erred in acquitting and discharging accused |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTICLES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LNS Article(s)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Acts
Amending Acts
PU(A)
PU(B)
Legislation Alert Updated
Revoked
|